Banyan Security vs Perimeter 81: Which one is better for your business?
Twingate Team
•
Sep 11, 2024
Secure access solutions are vital for modern enterprises, ensuring that sensitive data and resources remain protected in an increasingly digital world. By comparing Banyan Security and Perimeter 81, we aim to identify the best solution based on criteria such as ease of deployment, cost-effectiveness, user experience, and security features.
A Quick Overview on Banyan Security and Perimeter 81
What is Banyan Security?
Banyan Security, now part of SonicWall, specializes in secure access solutions for modern enterprises through device-centric Security Service Edge (SSE) technologies. Their offerings include Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA), VPN-as-a-Service (VPNaaS), and Cloud Access Security Broker (CASB), focusing on replacing traditional security appliances with cloud-based solutions. Unique features include granular policy controls and automated one-click service access, ensuring high-performance connectivity and robust security.
What is Perimeter 81?
Perimeter 81, part of Check Point's SASE solution, offers a unified network security platform designed for quick deployment and ease of use. Their services include Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA), Secure Web Gateway (SWG), and Firewall as a Service (FWaaS), all managed through an intuitive platform. Unique features include a global backbone network for low-latency connections and compliance with standards like SOC 2 Type 2 and GDPR.
Features of Banyan Security and Perimeter 81
Banyan Security Features
Banyan Security offers a range of unique features that cater to the needs of modern enterprises seeking secure access solutions.
Device-centric Security Service Edge (SSE): This approach focuses on securing access through the device itself, providing an additional layer of security that is unique compared to traditional methods.
Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA): Ensures that only authenticated and authorized users can access specific resources, minimizing the risk of unauthorized access.
VPN-as-a-Service (VPNaaS): Offers a cloud-based alternative to traditional VPNs, providing secure and scalable remote access without the need for on-premises hardware.
Cloud Access Security Broker (CASB): Protects cloud-based applications and data by enforcing security policies and providing visibility into cloud usage.
Granular Zero Trust Policy Controls: Allows for detailed and specific access policies, ensuring that only the right users and devices can access sensitive resources.
Perimeter 81 Features
Perimeter 81 offers a range of unique features that cater to the needs of modern enterprises seeking secure access solutions.
Global Backbone Network: Connects company resources over a high-performance global network, ensuring low-latency connections and reliable access.
Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA): Securely connects users to company resources, whether on-premises or in the cloud, minimizing the risk of unauthorized access.
Secure Web Gateway (SWG): Protects users and the network from internet-borne threats, providing an additional layer of security for web traffic.
Quick Deployment: Reduces setup time to under an hour, allowing organizations to secure their networks rapidly without extensive downtime.
The Cyber Complexity Trap™: Addresses the increasing complexity of protecting more environments and devices with a unified, simplified approach to network security, setting Perimeter 81 apart from its competitors.
Comparing Banyan Security, Perimeter 81 and Twingate's Features
Why choose one over the other?
Why Choose Banyan Security Over Perimeter 81: Banyan Security's device-centric Security Service Edge (SSE) approach offers an additional layer of security by focusing on the device itself, which can be particularly beneficial for organizations with a diverse range of devices. Additionally, their automated one-click service access simplifies the process of connecting to critical on-premises and cloud services, making it a more streamlined option for IT teams.
Why Choose Perimeter 81 Over Banyan Security: Perimeter 81's quick deployment feature allows organizations to secure their networks in under an hour, which is ideal for businesses needing rapid implementation. Furthermore, their global backbone network ensures low-latency connections, providing a reliable and high-performance experience for users accessing company resources from various locations.
Considering Twingate vs Banyan Security and Perimeter 81
Why Choose Twingate Over Banyan Security and Perimeter 81: Twingate's software-based Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA) eliminates the need for hardware, simplifying deployment and reducing maintenance costs. Unlike Banyan Security and Perimeter 81, Twingate offers intelligent device controls and DNS filtering, providing a more comprehensive security solution that enhances both productivity and protection.
What are the customers saying?
Banyan Security Reviews
Users have praised Banyan Security for its secure access and ease of use, particularly as a replacement for traditional VPNs. They find it reliable and effective in protecting sensitive data and ensuring secure connections. However, some users have expressed frustrations with updates causing disruptions, occasional logouts, and authentication failures that take time to resolve. Overall, Banyan Security has received an impressive rating of 4.9 out of 5 stars.
"I love the fact that I cannot access the personal data of our policyholders without first being connected to Banyan. The added layer of protection, especially during the time we're living in, is much needed." - Amika L.
"I like Banyan because you feel secure while getting your work done. I like that you don't have to do the traditional VPNs." - Verified User in Insurance
For more detailed reviews, visit Banyan Security Reviews.
Perimeter 81 Reviews
Users have shared mixed reviews about Perimeter 81, highlighting both its strengths and areas for improvement. Many appreciate the platform's ease of use and quick deployment, which allows businesses to secure their networks rapidly. The global backbone network is also praised for providing reliable, low-latency connections. However, some users have expressed frustrations with occasional connectivity issues and the complexity of managing multiple security features.
"The quick setup and intuitive interface make it easy to secure our network without extensive downtime." - John D.
"While the service is generally reliable, we've faced some connectivity issues that can be frustrating during critical times." - Sarah K.
Overall, Perimeter 81 has received a rating of 4.7 out of 5 stars. For more detailed reviews, visit Perimeter 81 Reviews.
Twingate Reviews
Users have generally praised Twingate for its ease of use, simple setup, and effective security features. Many reviews highlight its performance efficiency and the ability to manage remote access without significant IT support. Overall, Twingate has received a rating of 4.7 out of 5 stars.
"Twingate is incredibly easy to use and manage. We were set up and going in about a day." - Verified User
"It is simple and easy to set up and use. Unlike the other tools, there is no hustle in setting and using." - Ajohn
For more detailed reviews, visit Twingate Reviews.
Banyan Security, Perimeter 81, or Twingate: Which is the best platform for you?
In conclusion, while Banyan Security and Perimeter 81 offer robust and reliable secure access solutions, Twingate stands out for its ease of use, simple setup, and comprehensive security features. Any of these options would be a solid choice for modern enterprises, but Twingate's streamlined approach and intelligent device controls make it our top recommendation. For businesses looking to enhance productivity and protection with minimal hassle, Twingate is the way to go.
Rapidly implement a modern Zero Trust network that is more secure and maintainable than VPNs.
Banyan Security vs Perimeter 81: Which one is better for your business?
Twingate Team
•
Sep 11, 2024
Secure access solutions are vital for modern enterprises, ensuring that sensitive data and resources remain protected in an increasingly digital world. By comparing Banyan Security and Perimeter 81, we aim to identify the best solution based on criteria such as ease of deployment, cost-effectiveness, user experience, and security features.
A Quick Overview on Banyan Security and Perimeter 81
What is Banyan Security?
Banyan Security, now part of SonicWall, specializes in secure access solutions for modern enterprises through device-centric Security Service Edge (SSE) technologies. Their offerings include Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA), VPN-as-a-Service (VPNaaS), and Cloud Access Security Broker (CASB), focusing on replacing traditional security appliances with cloud-based solutions. Unique features include granular policy controls and automated one-click service access, ensuring high-performance connectivity and robust security.
What is Perimeter 81?
Perimeter 81, part of Check Point's SASE solution, offers a unified network security platform designed for quick deployment and ease of use. Their services include Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA), Secure Web Gateway (SWG), and Firewall as a Service (FWaaS), all managed through an intuitive platform. Unique features include a global backbone network for low-latency connections and compliance with standards like SOC 2 Type 2 and GDPR.
Features of Banyan Security and Perimeter 81
Banyan Security Features
Banyan Security offers a range of unique features that cater to the needs of modern enterprises seeking secure access solutions.
Device-centric Security Service Edge (SSE): This approach focuses on securing access through the device itself, providing an additional layer of security that is unique compared to traditional methods.
Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA): Ensures that only authenticated and authorized users can access specific resources, minimizing the risk of unauthorized access.
VPN-as-a-Service (VPNaaS): Offers a cloud-based alternative to traditional VPNs, providing secure and scalable remote access without the need for on-premises hardware.
Cloud Access Security Broker (CASB): Protects cloud-based applications and data by enforcing security policies and providing visibility into cloud usage.
Granular Zero Trust Policy Controls: Allows for detailed and specific access policies, ensuring that only the right users and devices can access sensitive resources.
Perimeter 81 Features
Perimeter 81 offers a range of unique features that cater to the needs of modern enterprises seeking secure access solutions.
Global Backbone Network: Connects company resources over a high-performance global network, ensuring low-latency connections and reliable access.
Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA): Securely connects users to company resources, whether on-premises or in the cloud, minimizing the risk of unauthorized access.
Secure Web Gateway (SWG): Protects users and the network from internet-borne threats, providing an additional layer of security for web traffic.
Quick Deployment: Reduces setup time to under an hour, allowing organizations to secure their networks rapidly without extensive downtime.
The Cyber Complexity Trap™: Addresses the increasing complexity of protecting more environments and devices with a unified, simplified approach to network security, setting Perimeter 81 apart from its competitors.
Comparing Banyan Security, Perimeter 81 and Twingate's Features
Why choose one over the other?
Why Choose Banyan Security Over Perimeter 81: Banyan Security's device-centric Security Service Edge (SSE) approach offers an additional layer of security by focusing on the device itself, which can be particularly beneficial for organizations with a diverse range of devices. Additionally, their automated one-click service access simplifies the process of connecting to critical on-premises and cloud services, making it a more streamlined option for IT teams.
Why Choose Perimeter 81 Over Banyan Security: Perimeter 81's quick deployment feature allows organizations to secure their networks in under an hour, which is ideal for businesses needing rapid implementation. Furthermore, their global backbone network ensures low-latency connections, providing a reliable and high-performance experience for users accessing company resources from various locations.
Considering Twingate vs Banyan Security and Perimeter 81
Why Choose Twingate Over Banyan Security and Perimeter 81: Twingate's software-based Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA) eliminates the need for hardware, simplifying deployment and reducing maintenance costs. Unlike Banyan Security and Perimeter 81, Twingate offers intelligent device controls and DNS filtering, providing a more comprehensive security solution that enhances both productivity and protection.
What are the customers saying?
Banyan Security Reviews
Users have praised Banyan Security for its secure access and ease of use, particularly as a replacement for traditional VPNs. They find it reliable and effective in protecting sensitive data and ensuring secure connections. However, some users have expressed frustrations with updates causing disruptions, occasional logouts, and authentication failures that take time to resolve. Overall, Banyan Security has received an impressive rating of 4.9 out of 5 stars.
"I love the fact that I cannot access the personal data of our policyholders without first being connected to Banyan. The added layer of protection, especially during the time we're living in, is much needed." - Amika L.
"I like Banyan because you feel secure while getting your work done. I like that you don't have to do the traditional VPNs." - Verified User in Insurance
For more detailed reviews, visit Banyan Security Reviews.
Perimeter 81 Reviews
Users have shared mixed reviews about Perimeter 81, highlighting both its strengths and areas for improvement. Many appreciate the platform's ease of use and quick deployment, which allows businesses to secure their networks rapidly. The global backbone network is also praised for providing reliable, low-latency connections. However, some users have expressed frustrations with occasional connectivity issues and the complexity of managing multiple security features.
"The quick setup and intuitive interface make it easy to secure our network without extensive downtime." - John D.
"While the service is generally reliable, we've faced some connectivity issues that can be frustrating during critical times." - Sarah K.
Overall, Perimeter 81 has received a rating of 4.7 out of 5 stars. For more detailed reviews, visit Perimeter 81 Reviews.
Twingate Reviews
Users have generally praised Twingate for its ease of use, simple setup, and effective security features. Many reviews highlight its performance efficiency and the ability to manage remote access without significant IT support. Overall, Twingate has received a rating of 4.7 out of 5 stars.
"Twingate is incredibly easy to use and manage. We were set up and going in about a day." - Verified User
"It is simple and easy to set up and use. Unlike the other tools, there is no hustle in setting and using." - Ajohn
For more detailed reviews, visit Twingate Reviews.
Banyan Security, Perimeter 81, or Twingate: Which is the best platform for you?
In conclusion, while Banyan Security and Perimeter 81 offer robust and reliable secure access solutions, Twingate stands out for its ease of use, simple setup, and comprehensive security features. Any of these options would be a solid choice for modern enterprises, but Twingate's streamlined approach and intelligent device controls make it our top recommendation. For businesses looking to enhance productivity and protection with minimal hassle, Twingate is the way to go.
Rapidly implement a modern Zero Trust network that is more secure and maintainable than VPNs.
Banyan Security vs Perimeter 81: Which one is better for your business?
Twingate Team
•
Sep 11, 2024
Secure access solutions are vital for modern enterprises, ensuring that sensitive data and resources remain protected in an increasingly digital world. By comparing Banyan Security and Perimeter 81, we aim to identify the best solution based on criteria such as ease of deployment, cost-effectiveness, user experience, and security features.
A Quick Overview on Banyan Security and Perimeter 81
What is Banyan Security?
Banyan Security, now part of SonicWall, specializes in secure access solutions for modern enterprises through device-centric Security Service Edge (SSE) technologies. Their offerings include Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA), VPN-as-a-Service (VPNaaS), and Cloud Access Security Broker (CASB), focusing on replacing traditional security appliances with cloud-based solutions. Unique features include granular policy controls and automated one-click service access, ensuring high-performance connectivity and robust security.
What is Perimeter 81?
Perimeter 81, part of Check Point's SASE solution, offers a unified network security platform designed for quick deployment and ease of use. Their services include Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA), Secure Web Gateway (SWG), and Firewall as a Service (FWaaS), all managed through an intuitive platform. Unique features include a global backbone network for low-latency connections and compliance with standards like SOC 2 Type 2 and GDPR.
Features of Banyan Security and Perimeter 81
Banyan Security Features
Banyan Security offers a range of unique features that cater to the needs of modern enterprises seeking secure access solutions.
Device-centric Security Service Edge (SSE): This approach focuses on securing access through the device itself, providing an additional layer of security that is unique compared to traditional methods.
Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA): Ensures that only authenticated and authorized users can access specific resources, minimizing the risk of unauthorized access.
VPN-as-a-Service (VPNaaS): Offers a cloud-based alternative to traditional VPNs, providing secure and scalable remote access without the need for on-premises hardware.
Cloud Access Security Broker (CASB): Protects cloud-based applications and data by enforcing security policies and providing visibility into cloud usage.
Granular Zero Trust Policy Controls: Allows for detailed and specific access policies, ensuring that only the right users and devices can access sensitive resources.
Perimeter 81 Features
Perimeter 81 offers a range of unique features that cater to the needs of modern enterprises seeking secure access solutions.
Global Backbone Network: Connects company resources over a high-performance global network, ensuring low-latency connections and reliable access.
Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA): Securely connects users to company resources, whether on-premises or in the cloud, minimizing the risk of unauthorized access.
Secure Web Gateway (SWG): Protects users and the network from internet-borne threats, providing an additional layer of security for web traffic.
Quick Deployment: Reduces setup time to under an hour, allowing organizations to secure their networks rapidly without extensive downtime.
The Cyber Complexity Trap™: Addresses the increasing complexity of protecting more environments and devices with a unified, simplified approach to network security, setting Perimeter 81 apart from its competitors.
Comparing Banyan Security, Perimeter 81 and Twingate's Features
Why choose one over the other?
Why Choose Banyan Security Over Perimeter 81: Banyan Security's device-centric Security Service Edge (SSE) approach offers an additional layer of security by focusing on the device itself, which can be particularly beneficial for organizations with a diverse range of devices. Additionally, their automated one-click service access simplifies the process of connecting to critical on-premises and cloud services, making it a more streamlined option for IT teams.
Why Choose Perimeter 81 Over Banyan Security: Perimeter 81's quick deployment feature allows organizations to secure their networks in under an hour, which is ideal for businesses needing rapid implementation. Furthermore, their global backbone network ensures low-latency connections, providing a reliable and high-performance experience for users accessing company resources from various locations.
Considering Twingate vs Banyan Security and Perimeter 81
Why Choose Twingate Over Banyan Security and Perimeter 81: Twingate's software-based Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA) eliminates the need for hardware, simplifying deployment and reducing maintenance costs. Unlike Banyan Security and Perimeter 81, Twingate offers intelligent device controls and DNS filtering, providing a more comprehensive security solution that enhances both productivity and protection.
What are the customers saying?
Banyan Security Reviews
Users have praised Banyan Security for its secure access and ease of use, particularly as a replacement for traditional VPNs. They find it reliable and effective in protecting sensitive data and ensuring secure connections. However, some users have expressed frustrations with updates causing disruptions, occasional logouts, and authentication failures that take time to resolve. Overall, Banyan Security has received an impressive rating of 4.9 out of 5 stars.
"I love the fact that I cannot access the personal data of our policyholders without first being connected to Banyan. The added layer of protection, especially during the time we're living in, is much needed." - Amika L.
"I like Banyan because you feel secure while getting your work done. I like that you don't have to do the traditional VPNs." - Verified User in Insurance
For more detailed reviews, visit Banyan Security Reviews.
Perimeter 81 Reviews
Users have shared mixed reviews about Perimeter 81, highlighting both its strengths and areas for improvement. Many appreciate the platform's ease of use and quick deployment, which allows businesses to secure their networks rapidly. The global backbone network is also praised for providing reliable, low-latency connections. However, some users have expressed frustrations with occasional connectivity issues and the complexity of managing multiple security features.
"The quick setup and intuitive interface make it easy to secure our network without extensive downtime." - John D.
"While the service is generally reliable, we've faced some connectivity issues that can be frustrating during critical times." - Sarah K.
Overall, Perimeter 81 has received a rating of 4.7 out of 5 stars. For more detailed reviews, visit Perimeter 81 Reviews.
Twingate Reviews
Users have generally praised Twingate for its ease of use, simple setup, and effective security features. Many reviews highlight its performance efficiency and the ability to manage remote access without significant IT support. Overall, Twingate has received a rating of 4.7 out of 5 stars.
"Twingate is incredibly easy to use and manage. We were set up and going in about a day." - Verified User
"It is simple and easy to set up and use. Unlike the other tools, there is no hustle in setting and using." - Ajohn
For more detailed reviews, visit Twingate Reviews.
Banyan Security, Perimeter 81, or Twingate: Which is the best platform for you?
In conclusion, while Banyan Security and Perimeter 81 offer robust and reliable secure access solutions, Twingate stands out for its ease of use, simple setup, and comprehensive security features. Any of these options would be a solid choice for modern enterprises, but Twingate's streamlined approach and intelligent device controls make it our top recommendation. For businesses looking to enhance productivity and protection with minimal hassle, Twingate is the way to go.
Solutions
Solutions
The VPN replacement your workforce will love.
Solutions