The Best 5 Alternatives to Perimeter 81 (+ Pricing & Reviews)
Twingate
•
Jul 27, 2024
Perimeter 81 is a cybersecurity platform offering enterprise-grade protection for businesses through a unified SASE (Secure Access Service Edge) solution. The platform simplifies secure network, cloud, and application access for modern and mobile workforces by transforming traditional network security technology into one unified Zero Trust Network as a Service.
Perimeter 81 Pricing
Perimeter 81 doesn't provide public pricing information on their website. However, you can visit their contact page to request a quote, schedule a demo, or get in touch with their sales team for more details on their plans and pricing.
Perimeter 81's Reviews
Users on G2 have shared their experiences with Perimeter 81, highlighting its ease of use, reliable performance, and efficient customer support. The overall rating given by users is a score of 4.4 out of 5, reflecting a high level of satisfaction with the platform. To read more about what users have to say and explore their feedback in detail, visit the Perimeter 81 reviews on G2.
5 Alternatives to Perimeter 81
1. Twingate
Twingate is a network security solution that replaces traditional VPNs, offering remote access through a zero-trust security model. Designed for seamless deployment and integration with existing infrastructure, Twingate focuses on ease of use and scalability, providing a secure and maintainable solution for businesses of all sizes.
Twingate Pricing
Twingate offers four pricing tiers: Starter (Free), Teams ($5/user/month), Business ($10/user/month), and Enterprise (Custom pricing). Visit their Pricing page for more information.
Twingate Reviews
Users have shared their experiences with Twingate on G2, providing valuable insights into the platform's performance, ease of use, and customer support. To read more about what users have to say and explore their feedback in detail, visit the Twingate reviews on G2.
Top 3 Use Cases of Twingate
Secure Remote Access: Twingate enables employees to access private resources securely from any location, without the complexity of traditional VPNs.
Third-Party Access Control: Grant and manage access for external partners, ensuring they only access the resources they need, maintaining security and compliance.
Zero Trust Network Segmentation: Twingate's zero trust model minimizes the attack surface by segmenting networks, reducing the risk of unauthorized access and data breaches.
3 Pros of Twingate
Pros:
User-friendly interface: Twingate offers a user-friendly interface, making it easy for non-technical users to navigate and manage secure access.
Zero-trust security model: Its zero-trust security model provides robust protection against unauthorized access and data breaches.
Scalability: Twingate's scalability allows businesses of all sizes to benefit from its secure remote access capabilities.
Twingate compared to Perimeter 81
Deployment and Integration: Perimeter 81 offers a unified SASE solution with a global backbone network, while Twingate focuses on replacing traditional VPNs with a software-based ZTNA approach, making it hardware-free and easier to deploy.
Security Features: Both solutions provide zero-trust security, but Perimeter 81 includes a Secure Web Gateway (SWG) for additional protection, whereas Twingate emphasizes preventing lateral network traffic and implementing the principle of least privilege across the entire network.
User Experience: Twingate is designed to reduce IT support tickets and improve productivity with its best-in-class speed, reliability, and user experience, while Perimeter 81 aims to provide an unmatched user experience through its robust, cost-effective, and easy-to-use platform.
2. Palo Alto Networks
Palo Alto Networks provides a comprehensive range of cybersecurity products and services, including network security, SASE, cloud security, and SOC solutions. Designed to proactively secure networks and monitor IoT devices, their offerings cater to businesses and organizations seeking to enhance their cybersecurity posture and protect their networks, cloud workloads, and endpoints.
Palo Alto Networks Pricing
Palo Alto Networks does not provide specific pricing information on their website. For details on their pricing, it's recommended to contact a specialist.
Palo Alto Networks Reviews
Users have shared their experiences with Prisma SASE by Palo Alto Networks on G2, providing valuable insights into the platform's performance, ease of use, and customer support. To read more about what users have to say and explore their feedback in detail, visit the Prisma SASE reviews on G2.
Top 3 Use Cases of Palo Alto Networks
Cloud Security: Palo Alto Networks safeguards cloud environments, ensuring data protection and compliance across multi-cloud deployments.
Endpoint Protection: Their solutions defend endpoints from cyber threats, providing advanced threat detection and prevention capabilities.
IoT Security: Palo Alto Networks monitors and secures IoT devices, preventing unauthorized access and maintaining network integrity.
3 Pros and Cons of Palo Alto Networks
Pros:
Comprehensive Security Suite: Palo Alto Networks offers a wide range of cybersecurity solutions, including network, cloud, and endpoint protection, catering to diverse security needs.
Strong Threat Detection: Users on G2 praise the platform's advanced threat detection and prevention capabilities, ensuring robust protection.
Flexible Deployment: Palo Alto Networks supports various deployment options, including on-premises, cloud, and hybrid environments, providing flexibility for businesses.
Cons:
Complex Interface: Some users on G2 find the platform's interface complex and challenging to navigate, especially for beginners.
High Cost: Palo Alto Networks' solutions can be expensive, potentially making it less accessible for smaller businesses or those with limited budgets.
Steep Learning Curve: Users may require extensive training and support to fully utilize the platform's features and capabilities, impacting ease of use.
Palo Alto Networks compared to Perimeter 81
Unified SASE Solution vs. Comprehensive Security Suite: Perimeter 81 offers a unified SASE solution with a global backbone network, zero-trust network access, and a secure web gateway, while Palo Alto Networks provides a wide range of cybersecurity solutions, including network, cloud, and endpoint protection.
Deployment Speed: Perimeter 81 boasts a quick 15-minute network deployment, whereas Palo Alto Networks offers various deployment options, including on-premises, cloud, and hybrid environments, without specifying deployment speed.
Cost-Effectiveness: Perimeter 81 emphasizes its cost-effective platform, with users reporting a 60% reduction in total cost of ownership, while Palo Alto Networks is known for its high-quality solutions, which can be expensive and potentially less accessible for smaller businesses or those with limited budgets.
3. Todyl
Todyl is a customizable cybersecurity platform that consolidates best-in-class security capabilities into a single, modular solution. Designed for businesses seeking comprehensive protection, Todyl adapts to changing needs and simplifies cybersecurity management.
Todyl Pricing
Todyl offers a customizable cybersecurity platform, but specific pricing information is not available on their website. For pricing details, visit Todyl's website and request a quote.
Todyl Reviews
Users have shared their experiences with Todyl on G2, providing valuable insights into the platform's performance, ease of use, and customer support.
Top 3 Use Cases of Todyl
Unified Threat Management: Todyl consolidates security tools, simplifying management and providing comprehensive protection against cyber threats.
Secure Remote Workforces: Todyl enables secure access to company resources, ensuring data protection for distributed teams and remote employees.
Compliance Assurance: Todyl helps businesses maintain regulatory compliance, safeguarding sensitive data and reducing the risk of costly violations.
3 Pros and Cons of Todyl
Pros:
Unified Security Solution: Todyl consolidates multiple security tools into one platform, simplifying management and providing comprehensive protection.
Flexible and Adaptable: Todyl's customizable platform adapts to changing business needs, ensuring continuous and relevant cybersecurity coverage.
Remote Workforce Support: Todyl enables secure access to company resources for distributed teams, ensuring data protection and compliance.
Cons:
Limited Reviews: Todyl has fewer user reviews on G2 compared to other cybersecurity platforms, making it harder to gauge user satisfaction.
Pricing Transparency: Todyl does not provide specific pricing information on their website, requiring potential customers to request a quote.
Learning Curve: Todyl's comprehensive platform may require some time for users to familiarize themselves with its features and capabilities.
Todyl compared to Perimeter 81
Unified SASE vs. Modular Cybersecurity: Perimeter 81 offers a unified SASE solution with a global backbone network, zero-trust network access, and a secure web gateway, while Todyl provides a customizable, modular cybersecurity platform with a range of best-in-class security capabilities.
Deployment and Management: Perimeter 81 emphasizes quick deployment and easy management with zero hardware and maintenance, whereas Todyl focuses on a single-agent platform for streamlined deployment and consolidated single-pane-of-glass management.
Cost-Effectiveness: Perimeter 81 highlights its cost-effective platform, while Todyl does not provide specific pricing information on their website, requiring potential customers to request a quote for their customizable cybersecurity solution.
4. Watchguard
WatchGuard is a cybersecurity provider offering a variety of solutions such as network security, endpoint security, multi-factor authentication, and secure Wi-Fi. Designed to simplify and automate security for businesses of all sizes, WatchGuard's products aim to support growth and adapt to changing security needs.
Watchguard Pricing
WatchGuard offers demos and free trials for their cybersecurity solutions, including a 30-day trial for Endpoint Security, AuthPoint, and DNSWatchGO. For pricing details, visit WatchGuard's website.
Watchguard Reviews
For user reviews and ratings of Watchguard, you can visit their page on G2. This platform provides valuable insights into the experiences of Snyk customers, helping you understand the platform's strengths and areas for improvement.
3 Pros and Cons of Watchguard
Pros:
Comprehensive Security Solutions: WatchGuard offers a wide range of products, including network security, endpoint security, and secure Wi-Fi, catering to diverse security needs.
Free Trials and Demos: WatchGuard provides demos and free trials for their cybersecurity solutions, allowing potential customers to evaluate their offerings before committing.
User-Friendly Interface: Users on G2 appreciate WatchGuard's intuitive interface, making it accessible for users with varying levels of technical expertise.
Cons:
Pricing Transparency: WatchGuard does not provide specific pricing information on their website, requiring potential customers to request a quote or explore free trials.
Complex Configuration: Some users on G2 report that WatchGuard's solutions can be complex to configure, potentially impacting ease of use.
Customer Support: A few users have mentioned that WatchGuard's customer support could be more responsive and efficient in addressing issues and providing assistance.
Watchguard compared to Perimeter 81
Unified SASE vs. Comprehensive Security Solutions: Perimeter 81 offers a unified SASE solution with a global backbone network, zero-trust network access, and a secure web gateway, while WatchGuard provides a wide range of products, including network security, endpoint security, and secure Wi-Fi, catering to diverse security needs.
Deployment Speed: Perimeter 81 boasts a quick 15-minute network deployment, whereas WatchGuard offers various deployment options without specifying deployment speed, but provides demos and free trials for users to evaluate their offerings before committing.
Cost-Effectiveness: Perimeter 81 emphasizes its cost-effective platform, while WatchGuard does not provide specific pricing information on their website, requiring potential customers to request a quote or explore free trials.
5. Zscaler
Zscaler is a cloud-based cybersecurity platform that offers comprehensive protection against a wide range of threats, including network security, data protection, and secure access for remote employees. Designed for businesses of all sizes, Zscaler focuses on ease of use and scalability, providing a secure and adaptable solution for evolving security needs.
Zscaler Pricing
Zscaler offers a variety of pricing plans, but specific details can be found on their Pricing and Plans page. For more information on Palo Alto Networks' pricing, visit G2.
Zscaler Reviews
For user reviews and experiences with Zscaler, you can visit the G2 Zscaler reviews page to gain insights into the platform's performance and effectiveness in cyber exposure management.
Top 3 Use Cases of Zscaler
Secure Remote Workforce: Zscaler enables safe access to applications and data for remote employees, ensuring business continuity and data protection.
Cloud Application Security: Zscaler safeguards cloud environments, preventing data breaches and maintaining compliance across multi-cloud deployments.
Advanced Threat Protection: Zscaler defends against sophisticated cyber threats, providing real-time detection and prevention capabilities.
3 Pros and Cons of Zscaler
Pros:
Comprehensive Security: Zscaler offers a wide range of protection, including secure remote workforce, cloud application security, and advanced threat protection.
Scalability: Zscaler's cloud-based platform is designed for businesses of all sizes, providing a secure and adaptable solution for evolving security needs.
Real-Time Detection: Zscaler's advanced threat protection capabilities ensure real-time detection and prevention of sophisticated cyber threats.
Cons:
Pricing Transparency: Zscaler's pricing plans are not clearly detailed on their website, requiring potential customers to explore further for specifics.
Complex Configuration: Some users on G2 report that Zscaler's platform can be challenging to configure, impacting ease of use for beginners.
Customer Support: A few users have mentioned that Zscaler's customer support could be more responsive and efficient in addressing issues and providing assistance.
Zscaler compared to Perimeter 81
Comparing Perimeter 81 and Zscaler, the following specific qualities separate them:
Unified SASE vs. Cloud-Based Cybersecurity: Perimeter 81 offers a unified SASE solution with a global backbone network, zero-trust network access, and a secure web gateway, while Zscaler provides a cloud-based cybersecurity platform with comprehensive protection against various threats, including network security, data protection, and secure access for remote employees.
Deployment and Management: Perimeter 81 emphasizes quick deployment and easy management with zero hardware and maintenance, whereas Zscaler focuses on ease of use and scalability through its cloud-based platform, adapting to evolving security needs.
Cost-Effectiveness: Perimeter 81 highlights its cost-effective platform, while Zscaler offers a variety of pricing plans, but specific details can be found on their Pricing and Plans page.
Looking to secure your technical infrastructure?
Twingate offers granular access controls and deployment automations to protect your VPC environment, ensuring secure remote access for distributed workforces. By implementing Zero Trust security tools, Twingate helps companies safeguard private resources and internet traffic, adapting to the modern world of work. (source)
Rapidly implement a modern Zero Trust network that is more secure and maintainable than VPNs.
The Best 5 Alternatives to Perimeter 81 (+ Pricing & Reviews)
Twingate
•
Jul 27, 2024
Perimeter 81 is a cybersecurity platform offering enterprise-grade protection for businesses through a unified SASE (Secure Access Service Edge) solution. The platform simplifies secure network, cloud, and application access for modern and mobile workforces by transforming traditional network security technology into one unified Zero Trust Network as a Service.
Perimeter 81 Pricing
Perimeter 81 doesn't provide public pricing information on their website. However, you can visit their contact page to request a quote, schedule a demo, or get in touch with their sales team for more details on their plans and pricing.
Perimeter 81's Reviews
Users on G2 have shared their experiences with Perimeter 81, highlighting its ease of use, reliable performance, and efficient customer support. The overall rating given by users is a score of 4.4 out of 5, reflecting a high level of satisfaction with the platform. To read more about what users have to say and explore their feedback in detail, visit the Perimeter 81 reviews on G2.
5 Alternatives to Perimeter 81
1. Twingate
Twingate is a network security solution that replaces traditional VPNs, offering remote access through a zero-trust security model. Designed for seamless deployment and integration with existing infrastructure, Twingate focuses on ease of use and scalability, providing a secure and maintainable solution for businesses of all sizes.
Twingate Pricing
Twingate offers four pricing tiers: Starter (Free), Teams ($5/user/month), Business ($10/user/month), and Enterprise (Custom pricing). Visit their Pricing page for more information.
Twingate Reviews
Users have shared their experiences with Twingate on G2, providing valuable insights into the platform's performance, ease of use, and customer support. To read more about what users have to say and explore their feedback in detail, visit the Twingate reviews on G2.
Top 3 Use Cases of Twingate
Secure Remote Access: Twingate enables employees to access private resources securely from any location, without the complexity of traditional VPNs.
Third-Party Access Control: Grant and manage access for external partners, ensuring they only access the resources they need, maintaining security and compliance.
Zero Trust Network Segmentation: Twingate's zero trust model minimizes the attack surface by segmenting networks, reducing the risk of unauthorized access and data breaches.
3 Pros of Twingate
Pros:
User-friendly interface: Twingate offers a user-friendly interface, making it easy for non-technical users to navigate and manage secure access.
Zero-trust security model: Its zero-trust security model provides robust protection against unauthorized access and data breaches.
Scalability: Twingate's scalability allows businesses of all sizes to benefit from its secure remote access capabilities.
Twingate compared to Perimeter 81
Deployment and Integration: Perimeter 81 offers a unified SASE solution with a global backbone network, while Twingate focuses on replacing traditional VPNs with a software-based ZTNA approach, making it hardware-free and easier to deploy.
Security Features: Both solutions provide zero-trust security, but Perimeter 81 includes a Secure Web Gateway (SWG) for additional protection, whereas Twingate emphasizes preventing lateral network traffic and implementing the principle of least privilege across the entire network.
User Experience: Twingate is designed to reduce IT support tickets and improve productivity with its best-in-class speed, reliability, and user experience, while Perimeter 81 aims to provide an unmatched user experience through its robust, cost-effective, and easy-to-use platform.
2. Palo Alto Networks
Palo Alto Networks provides a comprehensive range of cybersecurity products and services, including network security, SASE, cloud security, and SOC solutions. Designed to proactively secure networks and monitor IoT devices, their offerings cater to businesses and organizations seeking to enhance their cybersecurity posture and protect their networks, cloud workloads, and endpoints.
Palo Alto Networks Pricing
Palo Alto Networks does not provide specific pricing information on their website. For details on their pricing, it's recommended to contact a specialist.
Palo Alto Networks Reviews
Users have shared their experiences with Prisma SASE by Palo Alto Networks on G2, providing valuable insights into the platform's performance, ease of use, and customer support. To read more about what users have to say and explore their feedback in detail, visit the Prisma SASE reviews on G2.
Top 3 Use Cases of Palo Alto Networks
Cloud Security: Palo Alto Networks safeguards cloud environments, ensuring data protection and compliance across multi-cloud deployments.
Endpoint Protection: Their solutions defend endpoints from cyber threats, providing advanced threat detection and prevention capabilities.
IoT Security: Palo Alto Networks monitors and secures IoT devices, preventing unauthorized access and maintaining network integrity.
3 Pros and Cons of Palo Alto Networks
Pros:
Comprehensive Security Suite: Palo Alto Networks offers a wide range of cybersecurity solutions, including network, cloud, and endpoint protection, catering to diverse security needs.
Strong Threat Detection: Users on G2 praise the platform's advanced threat detection and prevention capabilities, ensuring robust protection.
Flexible Deployment: Palo Alto Networks supports various deployment options, including on-premises, cloud, and hybrid environments, providing flexibility for businesses.
Cons:
Complex Interface: Some users on G2 find the platform's interface complex and challenging to navigate, especially for beginners.
High Cost: Palo Alto Networks' solutions can be expensive, potentially making it less accessible for smaller businesses or those with limited budgets.
Steep Learning Curve: Users may require extensive training and support to fully utilize the platform's features and capabilities, impacting ease of use.
Palo Alto Networks compared to Perimeter 81
Unified SASE Solution vs. Comprehensive Security Suite: Perimeter 81 offers a unified SASE solution with a global backbone network, zero-trust network access, and a secure web gateway, while Palo Alto Networks provides a wide range of cybersecurity solutions, including network, cloud, and endpoint protection.
Deployment Speed: Perimeter 81 boasts a quick 15-minute network deployment, whereas Palo Alto Networks offers various deployment options, including on-premises, cloud, and hybrid environments, without specifying deployment speed.
Cost-Effectiveness: Perimeter 81 emphasizes its cost-effective platform, with users reporting a 60% reduction in total cost of ownership, while Palo Alto Networks is known for its high-quality solutions, which can be expensive and potentially less accessible for smaller businesses or those with limited budgets.
3. Todyl
Todyl is a customizable cybersecurity platform that consolidates best-in-class security capabilities into a single, modular solution. Designed for businesses seeking comprehensive protection, Todyl adapts to changing needs and simplifies cybersecurity management.
Todyl Pricing
Todyl offers a customizable cybersecurity platform, but specific pricing information is not available on their website. For pricing details, visit Todyl's website and request a quote.
Todyl Reviews
Users have shared their experiences with Todyl on G2, providing valuable insights into the platform's performance, ease of use, and customer support.
Top 3 Use Cases of Todyl
Unified Threat Management: Todyl consolidates security tools, simplifying management and providing comprehensive protection against cyber threats.
Secure Remote Workforces: Todyl enables secure access to company resources, ensuring data protection for distributed teams and remote employees.
Compliance Assurance: Todyl helps businesses maintain regulatory compliance, safeguarding sensitive data and reducing the risk of costly violations.
3 Pros and Cons of Todyl
Pros:
Unified Security Solution: Todyl consolidates multiple security tools into one platform, simplifying management and providing comprehensive protection.
Flexible and Adaptable: Todyl's customizable platform adapts to changing business needs, ensuring continuous and relevant cybersecurity coverage.
Remote Workforce Support: Todyl enables secure access to company resources for distributed teams, ensuring data protection and compliance.
Cons:
Limited Reviews: Todyl has fewer user reviews on G2 compared to other cybersecurity platforms, making it harder to gauge user satisfaction.
Pricing Transparency: Todyl does not provide specific pricing information on their website, requiring potential customers to request a quote.
Learning Curve: Todyl's comprehensive platform may require some time for users to familiarize themselves with its features and capabilities.
Todyl compared to Perimeter 81
Unified SASE vs. Modular Cybersecurity: Perimeter 81 offers a unified SASE solution with a global backbone network, zero-trust network access, and a secure web gateway, while Todyl provides a customizable, modular cybersecurity platform with a range of best-in-class security capabilities.
Deployment and Management: Perimeter 81 emphasizes quick deployment and easy management with zero hardware and maintenance, whereas Todyl focuses on a single-agent platform for streamlined deployment and consolidated single-pane-of-glass management.
Cost-Effectiveness: Perimeter 81 highlights its cost-effective platform, while Todyl does not provide specific pricing information on their website, requiring potential customers to request a quote for their customizable cybersecurity solution.
4. Watchguard
WatchGuard is a cybersecurity provider offering a variety of solutions such as network security, endpoint security, multi-factor authentication, and secure Wi-Fi. Designed to simplify and automate security for businesses of all sizes, WatchGuard's products aim to support growth and adapt to changing security needs.
Watchguard Pricing
WatchGuard offers demos and free trials for their cybersecurity solutions, including a 30-day trial for Endpoint Security, AuthPoint, and DNSWatchGO. For pricing details, visit WatchGuard's website.
Watchguard Reviews
For user reviews and ratings of Watchguard, you can visit their page on G2. This platform provides valuable insights into the experiences of Snyk customers, helping you understand the platform's strengths and areas for improvement.
3 Pros and Cons of Watchguard
Pros:
Comprehensive Security Solutions: WatchGuard offers a wide range of products, including network security, endpoint security, and secure Wi-Fi, catering to diverse security needs.
Free Trials and Demos: WatchGuard provides demos and free trials for their cybersecurity solutions, allowing potential customers to evaluate their offerings before committing.
User-Friendly Interface: Users on G2 appreciate WatchGuard's intuitive interface, making it accessible for users with varying levels of technical expertise.
Cons:
Pricing Transparency: WatchGuard does not provide specific pricing information on their website, requiring potential customers to request a quote or explore free trials.
Complex Configuration: Some users on G2 report that WatchGuard's solutions can be complex to configure, potentially impacting ease of use.
Customer Support: A few users have mentioned that WatchGuard's customer support could be more responsive and efficient in addressing issues and providing assistance.
Watchguard compared to Perimeter 81
Unified SASE vs. Comprehensive Security Solutions: Perimeter 81 offers a unified SASE solution with a global backbone network, zero-trust network access, and a secure web gateway, while WatchGuard provides a wide range of products, including network security, endpoint security, and secure Wi-Fi, catering to diverse security needs.
Deployment Speed: Perimeter 81 boasts a quick 15-minute network deployment, whereas WatchGuard offers various deployment options without specifying deployment speed, but provides demos and free trials for users to evaluate their offerings before committing.
Cost-Effectiveness: Perimeter 81 emphasizes its cost-effective platform, while WatchGuard does not provide specific pricing information on their website, requiring potential customers to request a quote or explore free trials.
5. Zscaler
Zscaler is a cloud-based cybersecurity platform that offers comprehensive protection against a wide range of threats, including network security, data protection, and secure access for remote employees. Designed for businesses of all sizes, Zscaler focuses on ease of use and scalability, providing a secure and adaptable solution for evolving security needs.
Zscaler Pricing
Zscaler offers a variety of pricing plans, but specific details can be found on their Pricing and Plans page. For more information on Palo Alto Networks' pricing, visit G2.
Zscaler Reviews
For user reviews and experiences with Zscaler, you can visit the G2 Zscaler reviews page to gain insights into the platform's performance and effectiveness in cyber exposure management.
Top 3 Use Cases of Zscaler
Secure Remote Workforce: Zscaler enables safe access to applications and data for remote employees, ensuring business continuity and data protection.
Cloud Application Security: Zscaler safeguards cloud environments, preventing data breaches and maintaining compliance across multi-cloud deployments.
Advanced Threat Protection: Zscaler defends against sophisticated cyber threats, providing real-time detection and prevention capabilities.
3 Pros and Cons of Zscaler
Pros:
Comprehensive Security: Zscaler offers a wide range of protection, including secure remote workforce, cloud application security, and advanced threat protection.
Scalability: Zscaler's cloud-based platform is designed for businesses of all sizes, providing a secure and adaptable solution for evolving security needs.
Real-Time Detection: Zscaler's advanced threat protection capabilities ensure real-time detection and prevention of sophisticated cyber threats.
Cons:
Pricing Transparency: Zscaler's pricing plans are not clearly detailed on their website, requiring potential customers to explore further for specifics.
Complex Configuration: Some users on G2 report that Zscaler's platform can be challenging to configure, impacting ease of use for beginners.
Customer Support: A few users have mentioned that Zscaler's customer support could be more responsive and efficient in addressing issues and providing assistance.
Zscaler compared to Perimeter 81
Comparing Perimeter 81 and Zscaler, the following specific qualities separate them:
Unified SASE vs. Cloud-Based Cybersecurity: Perimeter 81 offers a unified SASE solution with a global backbone network, zero-trust network access, and a secure web gateway, while Zscaler provides a cloud-based cybersecurity platform with comprehensive protection against various threats, including network security, data protection, and secure access for remote employees.
Deployment and Management: Perimeter 81 emphasizes quick deployment and easy management with zero hardware and maintenance, whereas Zscaler focuses on ease of use and scalability through its cloud-based platform, adapting to evolving security needs.
Cost-Effectiveness: Perimeter 81 highlights its cost-effective platform, while Zscaler offers a variety of pricing plans, but specific details can be found on their Pricing and Plans page.
Looking to secure your technical infrastructure?
Twingate offers granular access controls and deployment automations to protect your VPC environment, ensuring secure remote access for distributed workforces. By implementing Zero Trust security tools, Twingate helps companies safeguard private resources and internet traffic, adapting to the modern world of work. (source)
Rapidly implement a modern Zero Trust network that is more secure and maintainable than VPNs.
The Best 5 Alternatives to Perimeter 81 (+ Pricing & Reviews)
Twingate
•
Jul 27, 2024
Perimeter 81 is a cybersecurity platform offering enterprise-grade protection for businesses through a unified SASE (Secure Access Service Edge) solution. The platform simplifies secure network, cloud, and application access for modern and mobile workforces by transforming traditional network security technology into one unified Zero Trust Network as a Service.
Perimeter 81 Pricing
Perimeter 81 doesn't provide public pricing information on their website. However, you can visit their contact page to request a quote, schedule a demo, or get in touch with their sales team for more details on their plans and pricing.
Perimeter 81's Reviews
Users on G2 have shared their experiences with Perimeter 81, highlighting its ease of use, reliable performance, and efficient customer support. The overall rating given by users is a score of 4.4 out of 5, reflecting a high level of satisfaction with the platform. To read more about what users have to say and explore their feedback in detail, visit the Perimeter 81 reviews on G2.
5 Alternatives to Perimeter 81
1. Twingate
Twingate is a network security solution that replaces traditional VPNs, offering remote access through a zero-trust security model. Designed for seamless deployment and integration with existing infrastructure, Twingate focuses on ease of use and scalability, providing a secure and maintainable solution for businesses of all sizes.
Twingate Pricing
Twingate offers four pricing tiers: Starter (Free), Teams ($5/user/month), Business ($10/user/month), and Enterprise (Custom pricing). Visit their Pricing page for more information.
Twingate Reviews
Users have shared their experiences with Twingate on G2, providing valuable insights into the platform's performance, ease of use, and customer support. To read more about what users have to say and explore their feedback in detail, visit the Twingate reviews on G2.
Top 3 Use Cases of Twingate
Secure Remote Access: Twingate enables employees to access private resources securely from any location, without the complexity of traditional VPNs.
Third-Party Access Control: Grant and manage access for external partners, ensuring they only access the resources they need, maintaining security and compliance.
Zero Trust Network Segmentation: Twingate's zero trust model minimizes the attack surface by segmenting networks, reducing the risk of unauthorized access and data breaches.
3 Pros of Twingate
Pros:
User-friendly interface: Twingate offers a user-friendly interface, making it easy for non-technical users to navigate and manage secure access.
Zero-trust security model: Its zero-trust security model provides robust protection against unauthorized access and data breaches.
Scalability: Twingate's scalability allows businesses of all sizes to benefit from its secure remote access capabilities.
Twingate compared to Perimeter 81
Deployment and Integration: Perimeter 81 offers a unified SASE solution with a global backbone network, while Twingate focuses on replacing traditional VPNs with a software-based ZTNA approach, making it hardware-free and easier to deploy.
Security Features: Both solutions provide zero-trust security, but Perimeter 81 includes a Secure Web Gateway (SWG) for additional protection, whereas Twingate emphasizes preventing lateral network traffic and implementing the principle of least privilege across the entire network.
User Experience: Twingate is designed to reduce IT support tickets and improve productivity with its best-in-class speed, reliability, and user experience, while Perimeter 81 aims to provide an unmatched user experience through its robust, cost-effective, and easy-to-use platform.
2. Palo Alto Networks
Palo Alto Networks provides a comprehensive range of cybersecurity products and services, including network security, SASE, cloud security, and SOC solutions. Designed to proactively secure networks and monitor IoT devices, their offerings cater to businesses and organizations seeking to enhance their cybersecurity posture and protect their networks, cloud workloads, and endpoints.
Palo Alto Networks Pricing
Palo Alto Networks does not provide specific pricing information on their website. For details on their pricing, it's recommended to contact a specialist.
Palo Alto Networks Reviews
Users have shared their experiences with Prisma SASE by Palo Alto Networks on G2, providing valuable insights into the platform's performance, ease of use, and customer support. To read more about what users have to say and explore their feedback in detail, visit the Prisma SASE reviews on G2.
Top 3 Use Cases of Palo Alto Networks
Cloud Security: Palo Alto Networks safeguards cloud environments, ensuring data protection and compliance across multi-cloud deployments.
Endpoint Protection: Their solutions defend endpoints from cyber threats, providing advanced threat detection and prevention capabilities.
IoT Security: Palo Alto Networks monitors and secures IoT devices, preventing unauthorized access and maintaining network integrity.
3 Pros and Cons of Palo Alto Networks
Pros:
Comprehensive Security Suite: Palo Alto Networks offers a wide range of cybersecurity solutions, including network, cloud, and endpoint protection, catering to diverse security needs.
Strong Threat Detection: Users on G2 praise the platform's advanced threat detection and prevention capabilities, ensuring robust protection.
Flexible Deployment: Palo Alto Networks supports various deployment options, including on-premises, cloud, and hybrid environments, providing flexibility for businesses.
Cons:
Complex Interface: Some users on G2 find the platform's interface complex and challenging to navigate, especially for beginners.
High Cost: Palo Alto Networks' solutions can be expensive, potentially making it less accessible for smaller businesses or those with limited budgets.
Steep Learning Curve: Users may require extensive training and support to fully utilize the platform's features and capabilities, impacting ease of use.
Palo Alto Networks compared to Perimeter 81
Unified SASE Solution vs. Comprehensive Security Suite: Perimeter 81 offers a unified SASE solution with a global backbone network, zero-trust network access, and a secure web gateway, while Palo Alto Networks provides a wide range of cybersecurity solutions, including network, cloud, and endpoint protection.
Deployment Speed: Perimeter 81 boasts a quick 15-minute network deployment, whereas Palo Alto Networks offers various deployment options, including on-premises, cloud, and hybrid environments, without specifying deployment speed.
Cost-Effectiveness: Perimeter 81 emphasizes its cost-effective platform, with users reporting a 60% reduction in total cost of ownership, while Palo Alto Networks is known for its high-quality solutions, which can be expensive and potentially less accessible for smaller businesses or those with limited budgets.
3. Todyl
Todyl is a customizable cybersecurity platform that consolidates best-in-class security capabilities into a single, modular solution. Designed for businesses seeking comprehensive protection, Todyl adapts to changing needs and simplifies cybersecurity management.
Todyl Pricing
Todyl offers a customizable cybersecurity platform, but specific pricing information is not available on their website. For pricing details, visit Todyl's website and request a quote.
Todyl Reviews
Users have shared their experiences with Todyl on G2, providing valuable insights into the platform's performance, ease of use, and customer support.
Top 3 Use Cases of Todyl
Unified Threat Management: Todyl consolidates security tools, simplifying management and providing comprehensive protection against cyber threats.
Secure Remote Workforces: Todyl enables secure access to company resources, ensuring data protection for distributed teams and remote employees.
Compliance Assurance: Todyl helps businesses maintain regulatory compliance, safeguarding sensitive data and reducing the risk of costly violations.
3 Pros and Cons of Todyl
Pros:
Unified Security Solution: Todyl consolidates multiple security tools into one platform, simplifying management and providing comprehensive protection.
Flexible and Adaptable: Todyl's customizable platform adapts to changing business needs, ensuring continuous and relevant cybersecurity coverage.
Remote Workforce Support: Todyl enables secure access to company resources for distributed teams, ensuring data protection and compliance.
Cons:
Limited Reviews: Todyl has fewer user reviews on G2 compared to other cybersecurity platforms, making it harder to gauge user satisfaction.
Pricing Transparency: Todyl does not provide specific pricing information on their website, requiring potential customers to request a quote.
Learning Curve: Todyl's comprehensive platform may require some time for users to familiarize themselves with its features and capabilities.
Todyl compared to Perimeter 81
Unified SASE vs. Modular Cybersecurity: Perimeter 81 offers a unified SASE solution with a global backbone network, zero-trust network access, and a secure web gateway, while Todyl provides a customizable, modular cybersecurity platform with a range of best-in-class security capabilities.
Deployment and Management: Perimeter 81 emphasizes quick deployment and easy management with zero hardware and maintenance, whereas Todyl focuses on a single-agent platform for streamlined deployment and consolidated single-pane-of-glass management.
Cost-Effectiveness: Perimeter 81 highlights its cost-effective platform, while Todyl does not provide specific pricing information on their website, requiring potential customers to request a quote for their customizable cybersecurity solution.
4. Watchguard
WatchGuard is a cybersecurity provider offering a variety of solutions such as network security, endpoint security, multi-factor authentication, and secure Wi-Fi. Designed to simplify and automate security for businesses of all sizes, WatchGuard's products aim to support growth and adapt to changing security needs.
Watchguard Pricing
WatchGuard offers demos and free trials for their cybersecurity solutions, including a 30-day trial for Endpoint Security, AuthPoint, and DNSWatchGO. For pricing details, visit WatchGuard's website.
Watchguard Reviews
For user reviews and ratings of Watchguard, you can visit their page on G2. This platform provides valuable insights into the experiences of Snyk customers, helping you understand the platform's strengths and areas for improvement.
3 Pros and Cons of Watchguard
Pros:
Comprehensive Security Solutions: WatchGuard offers a wide range of products, including network security, endpoint security, and secure Wi-Fi, catering to diverse security needs.
Free Trials and Demos: WatchGuard provides demos and free trials for their cybersecurity solutions, allowing potential customers to evaluate their offerings before committing.
User-Friendly Interface: Users on G2 appreciate WatchGuard's intuitive interface, making it accessible for users with varying levels of technical expertise.
Cons:
Pricing Transparency: WatchGuard does not provide specific pricing information on their website, requiring potential customers to request a quote or explore free trials.
Complex Configuration: Some users on G2 report that WatchGuard's solutions can be complex to configure, potentially impacting ease of use.
Customer Support: A few users have mentioned that WatchGuard's customer support could be more responsive and efficient in addressing issues and providing assistance.
Watchguard compared to Perimeter 81
Unified SASE vs. Comprehensive Security Solutions: Perimeter 81 offers a unified SASE solution with a global backbone network, zero-trust network access, and a secure web gateway, while WatchGuard provides a wide range of products, including network security, endpoint security, and secure Wi-Fi, catering to diverse security needs.
Deployment Speed: Perimeter 81 boasts a quick 15-minute network deployment, whereas WatchGuard offers various deployment options without specifying deployment speed, but provides demos and free trials for users to evaluate their offerings before committing.
Cost-Effectiveness: Perimeter 81 emphasizes its cost-effective platform, while WatchGuard does not provide specific pricing information on their website, requiring potential customers to request a quote or explore free trials.
5. Zscaler
Zscaler is a cloud-based cybersecurity platform that offers comprehensive protection against a wide range of threats, including network security, data protection, and secure access for remote employees. Designed for businesses of all sizes, Zscaler focuses on ease of use and scalability, providing a secure and adaptable solution for evolving security needs.
Zscaler Pricing
Zscaler offers a variety of pricing plans, but specific details can be found on their Pricing and Plans page. For more information on Palo Alto Networks' pricing, visit G2.
Zscaler Reviews
For user reviews and experiences with Zscaler, you can visit the G2 Zscaler reviews page to gain insights into the platform's performance and effectiveness in cyber exposure management.
Top 3 Use Cases of Zscaler
Secure Remote Workforce: Zscaler enables safe access to applications and data for remote employees, ensuring business continuity and data protection.
Cloud Application Security: Zscaler safeguards cloud environments, preventing data breaches and maintaining compliance across multi-cloud deployments.
Advanced Threat Protection: Zscaler defends against sophisticated cyber threats, providing real-time detection and prevention capabilities.
3 Pros and Cons of Zscaler
Pros:
Comprehensive Security: Zscaler offers a wide range of protection, including secure remote workforce, cloud application security, and advanced threat protection.
Scalability: Zscaler's cloud-based platform is designed for businesses of all sizes, providing a secure and adaptable solution for evolving security needs.
Real-Time Detection: Zscaler's advanced threat protection capabilities ensure real-time detection and prevention of sophisticated cyber threats.
Cons:
Pricing Transparency: Zscaler's pricing plans are not clearly detailed on their website, requiring potential customers to explore further for specifics.
Complex Configuration: Some users on G2 report that Zscaler's platform can be challenging to configure, impacting ease of use for beginners.
Customer Support: A few users have mentioned that Zscaler's customer support could be more responsive and efficient in addressing issues and providing assistance.
Zscaler compared to Perimeter 81
Comparing Perimeter 81 and Zscaler, the following specific qualities separate them:
Unified SASE vs. Cloud-Based Cybersecurity: Perimeter 81 offers a unified SASE solution with a global backbone network, zero-trust network access, and a secure web gateway, while Zscaler provides a cloud-based cybersecurity platform with comprehensive protection against various threats, including network security, data protection, and secure access for remote employees.
Deployment and Management: Perimeter 81 emphasizes quick deployment and easy management with zero hardware and maintenance, whereas Zscaler focuses on ease of use and scalability through its cloud-based platform, adapting to evolving security needs.
Cost-Effectiveness: Perimeter 81 highlights its cost-effective platform, while Zscaler offers a variety of pricing plans, but specific details can be found on their Pricing and Plans page.
Looking to secure your technical infrastructure?
Twingate offers granular access controls and deployment automations to protect your VPC environment, ensuring secure remote access for distributed workforces. By implementing Zero Trust security tools, Twingate helps companies safeguard private resources and internet traffic, adapting to the modern world of work. (source)
Solutions
Solutions
The VPN replacement your workforce will love.
Solutions